Hitler and the Appeasement Policy of the 1930s Essay

Appeasement Policy was a foreign policy that was adapted by Britain and France in the 1930’s towards Germany. Britain and France let Hitler have whatever they considered necessary to preserve peace in Europe, as they merely wanted to focus on domestic issues, such as economy and unemployment . They believed that Hitler had certain aims and that once he had achieved these, he would be satisfied. So they allowed him to re-arm, invade the Rhineland (1936), and complete the Anschluss of Austria (1938) followed by the Sudetenland. Appeasement assumed Hitler would keep his side of the bargain, however it did not. Adolf Hitler proves that he is ruthless, a risk taker, and anti-Semitist throughout the†¦show more content†¦On September 27th, 1938 the Policy of Appeasement between Adolf Hitler and Neville Chamberlain had been strained. Chamberlain had neither desire nor economic stance to be drawn into a costly war. He was unwilling to oppose Hitler as he had feared another â€Å"Great War† would come into effect. Furthermore he favored a policy of appeasement. Chamberlain believed Hitler was a reasonable leader and planned on giving him whatever Germany needed, so that he could be satisfied or appeased. Chamberlain believed that Hitler would keep his promises. As well Canada’s Prime Minister, Mackenzie King was also in favor of appeasement and believed that Hitler was a â€Å"sincere man who had no intention to provoke a war.† He too, agreed with Chamberlain that Hitler could soon be appeased. Mackenzie King and Neville Chamberlain had what they believed to be good reasons for supporting appeasement, however Adolf Hitler was nothing but a cruel, ruthless man that manipulated all the countries leaders as to believing that he was a sincere, reasonable leader. In 1938 Germany achieved success in annexing Austria and Northwest Czechoslovakia. Hitler’s success in united Austria was due to the appeasement policy that British Prime Minister, Neville Chamberlain had adapted. Afterward, just after theShow MoreRelatedNazi Soviet Pact And The Treaty Of Versailles1600 Words   |  7 PagesAlthough Hitler s ambitions and ideology fuelled his aggressive foreign policy, which hinted that a military conflict was bound during the 1930 s, the failure of the policy of appeasement was largely responsible for the outbreak of the war in 1939. The failure of appeasement allowed Hitler to attain resources and land. This kind of expansion is a direct contributor into forming a violent and widespread battle that began in 1939. However, the failure of appeasement was also directly related withRead MoreThe Policy Of Appeasement During The Outbreak Of War Essay1332 Words   |  6 PagesEvaluate the view that the policy of appeasement played a major role in the outbreak of war in Europe in 1939. After the mass amount of life lost in World War One, many countries, through the League of Nations, opted to prevent future conflict. Due to the failure collective security, the idea that countries could discourage aggression, appeasement became a policy adopted in the 1930s, especially by the British. Appeasement was developed in the belief that countries such as Germany were unfairlyRead MoreJustifying Appeasement Essay example1192 Words   |  5 PagesJustifying Appeasement Appeasement was the foreign policy followed by the British and French governments in the 1930s, whereby they did not attack or confront other governments, specifically that of Germanys, when international laws were breached, but rather gave into some of the demands to keep the peace. After the horror and dramatic loss of innocent lives (amassing over 3 million) in the First World War, both the French and the British governments were keenRead MoreWorld War 2910 Words   |  4 Pagesbeen reached. However, in the late 1920 s and throughout the 1930 s, they realized that they were wrong. Dictators came into power in countries that were displeased with the results of World War I. Germany, Italy and Japan wanted power, so they took aggressive action that not even The League of Nations could stop. British Prime Minister Chamberlain thought that the best way to deal with Hitler was by following a policy of appeasement, but not everybody agreed with him. That is why the causes ofRead MoreTo What Extent Was the Policy of Appeasement the Main Cause for the Outbreak of War in Europe in 1939?1111 Words   |  5 PagesThe policy of appeasement was widely pursued by Britain and France in the 1930s, when it referred to attempting to satisfy Germanys demands by negotiation and compromise, which would avoid war. However due to its failure the policy of appeasement, to a large extent was responsible for the o utbreak of war in 1939. It is clear that if the Western Powers had retaliated against Hitler, war could have been avoided, it encouraged Hitler, Hitler could never be appeased, and that it prompted the Nazi-SovietRead MorePolicy of Appeasement: Good or Bad? - Essay836 Words   |  4 PagesPolicy of Appeasement: Good or Bad? After the Great War, Germany and a couple other countries were greatly punished, having to pay reparations and territorial losses. Hitler, soon to be a dictator, wanted to change that. He believed that Germany had been punished too severely and wanted revenge; because he had such a strong government and military, there were many ways of going about stopping him. During the 1930’s, the policy of appeasement was the most effective response to Hitler’s aggressionRead MorePutzier 1. Tessa Putzier. Ms. Jeanne Bitz . Language Arts.1293 Words   |  6 Pages1 Tessa Putzier Ms. Jeanne Bitz Language Arts March 27, 2017 The Causes Of World War Two On June, 28 1919, the Treaty of Versailles was signed. This treaty coupled with other factors, such as the Nazis rise to power in Germany, Europe’s policy of appeasement, and Germany’s invasion of Poland would lead to - and be direct causes of - World War II. In fact, when French military commander Marshal Foch heard of the signing of the Treaty of Versailles, her observed with extreme accuracy - â€Å"This isRead MoreThe Munich Agreement And The Anglo German Declaration1035 Words   |  5 Pagesinevitable between the great European powers and allowed Hitler to gather more territory with relative ease. This document between the powers of Germany, Italy, France, and the United Kingdom outlined the terms and conditions under which Germany would annex a large portion of Czechoslovakia. Throughout this text, the historical context and significance of the Munich Agreement will be analyzed. The Munich Agreement was produced in hopes to stop Hitler; he was threatening to unleash war upon Europe if heRead MoreBritain s Policy Of Appeasement2028 Words   |  9 PagesBritain in the 1930s followed a policy of appeasement to retain peace between countries and stop the fascist powers of Italy and Germany causing disruption. There is a subsequent amount of evidence to suggest the policy of appeasement was a failure due to events including the Abyssinian Crisis, the Reoccupation of the Rhineland, The Anglo-German Naval Agreement, the Spanish Civil War and the Anschluss. Although it can also be argued that Britain had some success with preventing the fascist powersRead MoreThe League Of Nations Of The United States1400 Words   |  6 Pagescritical situation in Europe in the 1930’s. The policy of Appeasement, fascist ideologies throughout Germany and Italy and the Nazi-soviet Aggression pact were all, in their own respect responsible for the outbreak of war in 1939. The League of Nations played a small role in the outbreak of war. The two key nations involved in the league were Britain and France, however, as Posselt states one key weakness of the league was that the USA was not involved. The leagues policy of collective security meant that